Acquisition position
Current all in cost
375.0 SEK
Current bid or estimate300.0 SEK
Modelled discount48.6%
Liquidity score76%
Vicke Lindstrand · Art glass · Höörs Auktionshall
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Höjd 15 cm.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 38% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 38% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 34% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 31% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 30% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
23% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
Designed by Vicke Lindstrand Swedish, 1904-1983 Kosta Glasbruk (now Kosta Boda) Kosta, Småland, Sweden, founded 1742
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoAnders Zorn Swedish, 1860-1920
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoHonoré Victorin Daumier French, 1808-1879
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoDesigned by Vicke Lindstrand Swedish, 1904-1983 Made by Orrefors Glassworks (Glasbruk) Småland, Sweden, founded 1898
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoCraig Kauffman American, 1932–2010
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarry Le Va American, 1941-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoHorace Vernet (French, 1789-1863) printed by Francois Seraphin Delpech (French, 1778-1825)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoAnders Zorn Swedish, 1860-1920
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarry Le Va American, 1941-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarry Le Va American, 1941-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarry Le Va American, 1941-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarry Le Va American, 1941-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12959 | 69% | 758.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 100%, factory marks 45% |
| 11626 | 69% | 400.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 100%, factory marks 45% |
| 4524 | 69% | 300.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 100%, factory marks 45% |
| 6716 | 69% | 2795.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 100%, factory marks 45% |
| 7635 | 69% | 9506.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 100%, factory marks 45% |
| 1137 | 68% | 2403.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 91%, factory marks 45% |
| 914 | 68% | 1229.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 89%, factory marks 45% |
| 1648 | 68% | 550.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 89%, factory marks 45% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.