Acquisition position
Johan Pettersson Berg · Silver and metalware · Skånes Auktionsverk
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Höjd 9, diameter 8,5 cm.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 38% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 35% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 33% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 33% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 33% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
François Boucher (French, 1703–1770)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoWillem van Mieris (Dutch, 1662–1747)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGiuseppe Maria Crespi (Italian, 1665–1747)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoFrancesco Solimena (Italian, 1657–1747)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoJoseph Highmore (English, 1692–1780)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoTorii Kiyonobu II Japanese, active c. 1725-61
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoTorii Kiyonobu II Japanese, active c. 1725-61
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoJoseph Highmore (English, 1692-1780)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoTorii Kiyonobu II Japanese, active c. 1725-61
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoTorii Kiyonobu II Japanese, active c. 1725-61
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoOkumura Masanobu Japanese, 1686-1764
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoTorii Kiyomasu II Japanese, 1706 (?)–1763 (?)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 805 | 58% | 4200.0 SEK | identity 74%, material 45%, size 62%, title 55%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 3081 | 56% | 650.0 SEK | identity 69%, material 45%, size 62%, title 48%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 7721 | 54% | 1325.0 SEK | identity 62%, material 45%, size 62%, title 54%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 16 | 54% | 800.0 SEK | identity 62%, material 45%, size 62%, title 42%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 951 | 52% | 4200.0 SEK | identity 56%, material 45%, size 62%, title 54%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 9685 | 52% | 2000.0 SEK | identity 56%, material 45%, size 62%, title 44%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 7804 | 52% | 600.0 SEK | identity 56%, material 45%, size 62%, title 45%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
| 10126 | 51% | 1900.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 93%, hallmarks 45%, weight 62% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.