Acquisition position
Gunnar Hansson · Ceramics and porcelain · Garpenhus Auktioner
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Höjder ca 8-9 cm Has resale rights.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 44% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
26% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 35% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
Edvard Munch (Norwegian, 1863-1944) printed by Lassally (German, late 19th-early 20th century)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoCatherine Gass American, born 1972
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGunnar Lundberg American, born Sweden, 20th cen.tury
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoWalter Shirlaw (American, 1838–1909)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoGérard Edelinck (French, born Flanders, 1640-1707) after Hyacinthe Rigaud (French, 1659-1743)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2997 | 67% | 350.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 92%, factory marks 45% |
| 2366 | 67% | 300.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 90%, factory marks 45% |
| 4212 | 67% | 450.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 83%, factory marks 45% |
| 17724 | 65% | 200.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 45%, size 62%, title 58%, factory marks 45% |
| 14318 | 61% | 300.0 SEK | identity 87%, material 45%, size 62%, title 65%, factory marks 45% |
| 7843 | 61% | 300.0 SEK | identity 87%, material 45%, size 62%, title 65%, factory marks 45% |
| 5665 | 61% | 400.0 SEK | identity 87%, material 45%, size 62%, title 64%, factory marks 45% |
| 12083 | 56% | 1774.0 SEK | identity 67%, material 45%, size 62%, title 80%, factory marks 45% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.