Acquisition position
Current all in cost
525.0 SEK
Current bid or estimate300.0 SEK
Modelled discount71.7%
Liquidity score82%
Gösta Bjelkebo · Paintings · Gomér & Andersson Jönköping
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Rammått ca 60 x 47 cm, bildmått ca 45,5 x 32,5 cm.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 39% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 38% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 34% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 34% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 34% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 33% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 32% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 31% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 31% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
Georgia O'Keeffe American, 1887-1986
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoMary Cassatt American, 1844-1926
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoArthur Dove American, 1880-1946
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoFrançois Boucher French, 1703-1770
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoJohn Singleton Copley (American, 1738–1815)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoWayne Thiebaud American, 1920-2021
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoEdgar Degas French, 1834-1917
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoJean-François Raffaëlli French, 1850-1924
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoOdilon Redon French, 1840-1916
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoEdgar Degas French, 1834-1917
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoEdgar Degas French, 1834-1917
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoCamille Pissarro French, 1830–1903
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18236 | 56% | 1750.0 SEK | identity 57%, material 45%, size 62%, title 58% |
| 19606 | 52% | 400.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 71% |
| 16515 | 52% | 5500.0 SEK | identity 50%, material 45%, size 62%, title 53% |
| 18329 | 52% | 13000.0 SEK | identity 50%, material 45%, size 62%, title 53% |
| 19418 | 52% | 350.0 SEK | identity 56%, material 45%, size 62%, title 32% |
| 18426 | 52% | 1225.0 SEK | identity 53%, material 45%, size 62%, title 42% |
| 20890 | 51% | 2800.0 SEK | identity 50%, material 45%, size 62%, title 48% |
| 18433 | 51% | 4400.0 SEK | identity 48%, material 45%, size 62%, title 55% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.