Acquisition position
Unknown maker or artist · Jewelry · Skånes Auktionsverk
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Bestående av: överdel i bomull, kjol, förkläde och livstycke i ull, sjal i siden, väska i läder med mässingshake, brosch i mässing. Snörning till livet saknas. Klädförvaring medföljer. Tillägg: broderad sidenhätta medföljer. Kjolens midjemått ca 72 cm (finns några cm att lägga ut). Kjolens längd ca 81 cm.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 36% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 35% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 33% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 27% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
23% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 27% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
23% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 26% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
23% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 25% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
22% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 24% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
22% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
Helen Frankenthaler (American, 1928-2011) produced at Universal Limited Art Editions (American, founded 1955)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoCaret Caret French, 19th century
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoJacques Callot French, 1592-1635
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoAfter a design by Jacob Jordaens (1593–1678) Woven at the workshop of Jan van Leefdael (1603–1668) Brussels
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of Chicagostanley brouwn published by art & project, amsterdam
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of Chicagostanley brouwn published by art & project, amsterdam
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoPresumably woven at the workshop of Jacques I Geubels (died 1601/05) or his widow Catharina van den Eynde (died before 1629) Brussels
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoAfter a cartoon by Lodewijk van Schoor (died 1702) and Pieter Spierinckx (1635–1711) Woven at the workshop of Albert Auwercx (1629–1709) Brussels
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBarbara S. Spitz American, born 1926
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoSam Taylor-Wood English, born 1967
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoZarina Bhimji Ugandan, born 1963
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoAfter a design by Justus van Egmont (1601–1674) Woven at the workshop of Willem van Leefdael (1632–1688) Brussels
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.