Acquisition position
Dalahäst G · Paintings · Karlstad Hammarö Auktionsverk
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Höjd 26 cm. Längd 23 cm.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Visual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 86% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
33% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 41% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 39% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 37% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
25% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 36% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 35% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 34% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
24% combined confidenceVisual 0% · Name 24% · Marks 25% · Material 40%
22% combined confidenceClosed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
South German, Nuremberg
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoSouth German; Augsburg
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoWestern European
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoNyamwezi Sikonge, Tanzania Eastern and Southern Africa
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoBelgium
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoLan Ying (Chinese, 1585-c. 1664)
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoCauleen Smith American, born 1967
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoR. G. Gillet French, born 1939
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoWilliam LeBaron Jenney American, 1832-1907
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoFrancisco Mora Mexican, 1922-2002
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoManjunath Kamath Indian, born 1972
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openArt Institute of ChicagoDesigned by Nathalie Du Pasquier (French, born 1957) Produced by Rainbow Italy, Milan
0% similarityCheck object rights; API metadata is openComparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23179 | 61% | 400.0 SEK | identity 72%, material 45%, size 62%, title 52% |
| 23966 | 50% | 300.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 52% |
| 23714 | 49% | 200.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 48% |
| 24119 | 49% | 550.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 47% |
| 23744 | 49% | 750.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 43% |
| 24397 | 49% | 1270.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 43% |
| 23863 | 49% | 350.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 43% |
| 23912 | 49% | 850.0 SEK | identity 45%, material 45%, size 62%, title 43% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.