Acquisition position
Olof Nyström · Silver and metalware · Demonstration Auction
Acquisition position
Potential market value
Evidence strength
Market anomaly
Risk profile
Investigation rationale
Decision guardrails
Visual laboratory
Object record
Lidded silver bowl. silver. 830 silver. ON Stockholm 1918 830.
Identity resolution
Ranked from independent evidence. Confirmation or rejection becomes controlled training data.
Run global research after adding the clearest available front, back, marks and label images.
Closed deal feedback
Enter the verified hammer price after the auction closes. Only verified outcomes become calibration data.
Learning guardrail
Global research evidence
Run global research to search museum and authority collections.
Comparable logic
| Comparable ID | Match | Price | Reasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | 94% | 33800.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 93%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 93% |
| 35 | 95% | 30160.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 96%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 95% |
| 34 | 96% | 27040.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 98%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 98% |
| 33 | 96% | 24440.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 99%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 99% |
| 32 | 95% | 21840.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 96%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 96% |
| 31 | 94% | 18720.0 SEK | identity 100%, material 100%, size 94%, title 100%, hallmarks 100%, weight 93% |
Automatic signature module
The local engine detects and isolates candidate regions, searches the trusted mark library and runs conservative signature forensics. Optional AI interprets unreadable regions and creates research queries without changing the forensic verdict.
The module runs during normal analysis when a local image is available.
Marks laboratory
110 independent methods generate cleanup variants, stroke and symbol descriptors, library matches, trust controls and conflict warnings.
Signature forensics
This does not declare a signature genuine. It measures fit against a multi-source reference set, confusing signers and natural variation.
Run mark matching first, then compare the questioned signature against a sufficiently broad trusted reference set.